BVA's Record-Breaking Year: Cause for Celebration or Concern?

admin@westdunn.com

The Board of Veterans Appeals is celebrating a record-breaking year. In Fiscal Year 2019, which ended on October 1, the Board of Veterans Appeals decided 95,089 appeals, surpassing their goal by 5,000 decisions. The number of hearings held was also up by nearly 40 percent. This comes after 2018 saw a record-breaking number of appeals decided.

While veterans would like more timely decisions, advocates have expressed concern that the increased production has come at the expense of quality. BVA employees appear to share this concern. In 2017, as BVA began ramping up production, nearly one hundred attorneys at the Board of Veterans Appeals signed a loss of confidence statement. They expressed concern over increased productivity standards, lack of training, and inefficient software. They stated BVA leadership is “intent on interfering with the Board’s ability to review the entire record by imposing a production quota on attorneys he knows is unattainable unless de novo review is abandoned. In effect, Executive In Charge [David] Spickler [the current Acting Vice Chairman of the Board] will render the Board meaningless. The result will be a short-term, artificial increase in the board’s overall output … at the expense of the Board’s integrity…. In the long-run, this shortsighted policy will only increase the Board’s backlog because inaccurate decisions result in more unnecessary remands to the regional offices and appeals to the US Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, many of which will come back to the Board for additional review.”

The Board claims to have increased productivity while also maintaining incredibly high accuracy rates; however, a recent study from Stanford University demonstrates that their productivity numbers are misleading, as they fail to account for a huge class of errors, the failure to adequately explain decisions. This type of error accounts for over 60 percent of the remands from CAVC. In 2018, 4,842 BVA decisions were appealed to the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. Only seven percent of these BVA decisions were affirmed. In the same year, BVA claimed to have maintained a 93.5 percent accuracy rate. The focus on increased productivity and the unwillingness to credibly report accuracy rates indicates that statistics trump delivery of a quality product. For this reason, some veterans advocates see less cause for celebration in BVA’s pronouncements of success.


Jason Johns of West & Dunn Voted CAVC President-Elect

West and Dunn is pleased to announce that Jason E. Johns, an attorney at our Waunakee office, was selected by the national membership of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims Bar Association at is recent annual meeting to serve as its President-Elect (becoming President in September 2020). 

Badger Football Ticket Lottery for Veterans Now Open

Badger Football Ticket Lottery for Veterans Now Open

The Wisconsin Department of Veterans Affairs has announced that it is giving away free tickets to the Wisconsin Badgers Salute to Veterans football game. Watch the Badgers take on the Kent State Golden Flashes on Saturday, Oct. 5 at Camp Randall Stadium.

West & Dunn Supports ABA Veterans Claims Assistance Network

West & Dunn Supports ABA Veterans Claims Assistance Network

West & Dunn encourages attorneys to volunteer for the American Bar Association’s Veterans Claims Assistance Network. Through VCAN, attorneys will receive free training that will permit them to assist veterans with filing initial claims for service connected disability benefits from the US Department of Veterans Affairs.

VA Stays Agent Orange Claims for Blue Water Navy Vets

VA Stays Agent Orange Claims for Blue Water Navy Vets

Only July 1, 2019, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs ordered the Veterans Benefits Administration and Board of Veterans Appeals to stay proceedings with respect to all claims for disability compensation that are based on service in the offshore waters of the Republic of Vietnam between January 9, 1962, and May 7, 1975.

Supreme Court Permits Law Enforcement Officers to Inquire About Weapons in Vehicles

Supreme Court Permits Law Enforcement Officers to Inquire About Weapons in Vehicles

In a unanimous decision, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled that a motorists 4th Amendment rights were not violated when law enforcement officers asked whether he possessed a concealed carry permit and whether there were firearms in the vehicle.

Weapons Check During Traffic Stop Does Not Violate 4th Amendment

Weapons Check During Traffic Stop Does Not Violate 4th Amendment

The Wisconsin Supreme Court recently had the opportunity to address the issue of whether a police officer can ask a motorist, during a routine traffic stop, if the motorist possessed a valid concealed carry (CCW) permit and whether there were any firearms in the vehicle.